Help sustain
SpideredNews
NEWS SUMMARY PAGE
Add SN feed to your site

Add SN feed to your site
 NEWS SUMMARY
Breaking News

 IMPORTANT : Please use top right "PayPal Donate" link to help sustain SpideredNews.com.

"In an era where media consolidation is occurring at an all-too rapid pace it's essential to look for alternative news sources that are free from corporate bias. The future of our rather stupid species depends on it. Sites like yours have made a massive impact on me over the last year, I'm very grateful." http://www.lukeskirenko.com

"SpideredNews is a REALLY good resource. Thanks for the effort and time you put in to providing it." Comment by SetFree

Hint: If you spot (or create) an article or video which should be highlighted, please post it on the WPN Forums. SpideredNews.com could then spotlight it.
Highlighted Water NewsAdd to NEWS SUMMARY page
WPN  
GUARDIAN Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:28:37 GMT
National Rail and service operators warn of drastically reduced services from 6 April if action goes ahead Talks aimed at averting the first national rail strike since 1994 resumed at Acas today as train operators draw up emergency timetables and warned that only one in five trains would run over the four days from 6 April if the action went ahead. Two separate strikes are due to begin next Tuesday. Between them, they will bring the network to a halt. Signal staff plan to strike for four hours in the morning and evening rush hours, while thousands of maintenance workers and supervisors are being called out for four days. The action is in protest at plans to cut 1,500 maintenance jobs and change work patterns. Bob Crow, the general secretary of the RMT union, said his negotiators had worked "flat out" to try to reach agreement, while Gerry Doherty, the general secretary of the TSSA union, said the strike was about the safety of the travelling public and his union members. In an open letter posted on the Network Rail website, Iain Coucher, the chief executive, accused union leaders of not considering settlement offers seriously. "We will keep trying to help the unions and their members understand our offers to avoid strikes, but they must want to negotiate and not just make empty gestures about talking," he wrote. National Rail is drawing up emergency timetables and offering advice on refunds and alternative travel arrangements. The pattern emerging is patchy, with some operators hoping to run a near-normal service and others expecting to be down to a handful of trains. Eurostar is predicting that all services will run over the four strike days. However, escaping Britain by plane may be trickier – Gatwick Express will run a rail replacement bus between the airport and London Victoria between 6.50pm and 10.30pm, and then a limited overnight train service. Heathrow Express and Heathrow Connect are still finalising plans. Many operators are warning that the limited train services they hope to operate will close down completely in the early evening. London Midland and Virgin will both run between one and four trains an hour on the busiest routes – although Virgin hopes to run a normal service between London Euston and Glasgow – but they will shut down all services by 7pm. C2C, used by thousands of commuters between Essex and London, will have no trains in the early-morning rush hour between 6am and 7am, or between 7pm and 10pm. A drastically curtailed service is then expected until midnight. Chiltern Railways will run its last trains from London Marylebone between 5pm and 5.30pm. SouthEastern and Southern will both run curtailed services between Kent and Sussex and London, closing down completely at 7pm. South West Trains, another nusy commuter service taking people from the western home counties into London Waterloo, expects to run "a reduced service for part of the day". National Rail and train operators are warning passengers to check updates before travelling if the strike goes ahead. Transport Rail transport Trade unions Maev Kennedy guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
GUARDIAN Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:59:56 GMT
Mayor of London speaks out as new permit scheme is launched for utilities digging up capital's streets Boris Johnson today blamed Margaret Thatcher for turning Britain into one of the most "roadwork afflicted nations in the world". The Conservative mayor of London made his comments on the day a new scheme was launched in sections of the capital that will see utility companies wishing to dig up London's roads forced to apply for a permit scheme to ensure they "share trenches" with each other in a bid to minimise traffic disruption. Johnson hopes that the move will reduce the 300,000 holes dug each year, which he says are responsible for 36% of traffic delays in the capital and cost business little short of £1bn. Johnson described the system that allows different utility companies to dig up roads "without warning and without so much as a by your leave" as a "disgrace". He wrote: "I am afraid it all goes back to Mrs Thatcher. She decided – entirely reasonably – that these new concerns should be given every possible help in maximising efficiency and delivering services. "So they were given quite amazing powers to dig up the road. That might have been sensible in the 80s, when there were only two or three privatised utilities. It looks utterly crazy today ... The whole system is a disgrace." Transport for London (TfL) and 16 of the capital's 33 boroughs are the first authorities to make use of government legislation introduced in 2007 designed to limit disruption by coordinating the road-digging timetables of all interested parties "for the same sections of road at the same time". Under the scheme, a water company wishing to dig a hole, for example, will first have to apply for a permit costing between £40 and £240 – depending upon the complexity of the works and the category of roads – which will allow TfL or the relevant council to coordinate the timing of when the roadworks will take place. The maximum fine for working without a permit will be £5,000, while the maximum for breaking the permit's conditions will be £2,500. Johnson said: "This significant step shows London has got serious about dealing with the nonsensical situation of companies being able to simply turn up and dig without a care in the world for the consequences. It will encourage the utilities to share their trenches, which will reduce disruption and Londoners' frustration." He insisted the only way for politicians to increase their "cone-busting power" is to introduce a lane-rental scheme that would see companies paying for every minute spent digging up roads. The mayor highlighted the limits of the permit scheme in his Daily Telegraph column: "You will see the flaw. Suppose you have a two-week job and you want to make sure your diggers get it done without incurring any fines. What do you do? You apply for a four-week permit, don't you? That means your boys can have a full fortnight of making tea and staring at the hole – or rather, they can have a full fortnight in which they go off and do a different job, leaving the hole untended and the drivers bending their steering wheels in frustration." The Department for Transport said a lane-rental scheme for utilities digging up the most sensitive routes was already under consideration. Sadiq Khan, the transport minister, welcomed London's take-up of the permit scheme scheme for which councils have to apply. "I hope that other councils around the country will follow," said the minister. London politics Transport Transport policy London Boris Johnson Local government Local politics Road transport Politics past Margaret Thatcher Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
GUARDIAN Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:36:14 GMT
Report names Manchester Victoria, Clapham Junction and Crewe as falling short of proposed minimum standards Government advisers today named Britain's 10 worst railway stations and demanded urgent funding to bring them up to acceptable standards. Manchester Victoria, Clapham Junction and Crewe stations were named as the three worst, described as "extreme examples" of a wider problem of Victorian stations falling well short of proposed minimum standards because of neglect and lack of resources. Chris Green, a stations expert, and the planning expert Sir Peter Hall were commissioned as station champions by the transport minister, Lord Adonis, after he expressed concern about the state of stations in April. Their report will make awkward reading for ministers, describing the country's stations as "mediocre" and almost half national interchange stations falling short of proposed minimum standards. The document complained of "shabby environments, deteriorated stations and lack of real-time information". Warrington Bank Quay, Barking, Preston, Wigan North Western, Luton, Liverpool Central and Stockport made up the remainder of the list of the 10 worst stations. All scored below 50% against the proposed minimum standards on inspection visits. Green and Hall's report said the stations should have been "upgraded many years ago" but had not been because of planning problems and a lack of funding. It said the cash available for Britain's 66 interchange stations was "inadequate" and urged "priority" funding for the 10 worst, recommending a 25% increase in planned funding to £800m a year. "The downsizing of 19th century stations has not been tackled comprehensively, and many stations need one-off investment in reducing or removing buildings to make them both more user friendly and cheaper to maintain," it added. The report praised Scotland's record in improving stations as an example for England and Wales to follow. The larger, so-called A, or hub, stations fared better, with the exception of Waterloo which, the report said, suffered "some of the worst passenger congestion problems in London" while the former channel tunnel platforms remain unused. Lord Adonis welcomed the report as he began a day-long tour of the worst stations identified. "I want to see these ten stations at first hand, and to discuss their future with local rail managers and passengers groups," he said. "I am keen to make these new [minimum] standards a feature of future franchise agreements between the government and the train operating companies." Anthony Smith, the chief executive of the rail customer watchdog Passenger Focus, said: "Passengers standing on windswept platforms across Britain should be able to find out if their train is coming or not. "There are all too many stations that do not have any real-time information – and in the 21st century this is outrageous." Michael Roberts, chief executive of the Association of Train Operating Companies, said stations were "the shopfront for the railways". "This is a comprehensive report which rightly highlights that, while passenger satisfaction with stations has risen in recent years, much more needs to be done to deliver a consistently good station experience," he added. Transport Transport policy Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
GUARDIAN Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:37:42 GMT
Meat wastes water, creates greenhouse gases and could become as socially unacceptable as drink-driving Eating meat could become as socially unacceptable as drink-driving because of the impact it has on global warming, according to a senior authority on climate change. Lord Stern of Brentford, former adviser to the government on the economics of climate change, said people will have to consider turning vegetarian to help reduce global carbon emissions. "Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources. A vegetarian diet is better," Stern said. Farmed ruminant animals, including cattle and sheep, are thought to be responsible for up to a quarter of "man-made" methane emissions worldwide. Stern, whose 2006 Stern Review warned that countries needed to spend 1% of their GDP to stop greenhouse gases rising to dangerous levels, said a successful deal at the climate change conference in Copenhagen in December would massively increase the cost of producing meat. People's concerns about climate change would lead to meat eating becoming unacceptable, he predicted. "I think it's important that people think about what they are doing and that includes what they are eating," he told the Times. "I am 61 now and attitudes towards drinking and driving have changed radically since I was a student. People change their notion of what is responsible. They will increasingly ask about the carbon content of their food." Stern, a former chief economist at the World Bank and now IG Patel Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics, also warned that helping developing countries to cope with the adverse effects of global warming would cost British taxpayers about £3bn a year by 2015. Meanwhile, an international effort to ensure that biofuel used by Britain and other western countries to tackle global warming does not damage the environment is on the brink of collapse. The Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), an initiative of companies and campaigners, is divided over the need to control carbon emissions and could break up within days, insiders say. Ministers last year introduced a demand on fuel suppliers to replace 2.5% of petrol and diesel sold with biofuel, at least 8% of which is currently palm oil. The RSPO was established to set and enforce environmental standards for palm oil production, but has run into trouble after palm plantation companies in Indonesia and Malaysia blocked efforts to curb their greenhouse gas emissions. "If this issue is not resolved and greenhouse gas emissions are not included in the standard, then I don't see how the RSPO can continue to act as a certifying body," said Marcus Silvius of environment group Wetlands International, who sits on the RSPO's working group on greenhouse gases. Carbon emissions The meat industry Climate change Food Climate change David Adam David Batty guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
WORLDPRESSNETWORK Thursday July 17, 2008
The following article by Stephen Lendman on the extreme water crisis in Israel and Palestine (Refuse to call Palestine “Territories”!) is a good place to begin to discuss the problem caused by Israel’s decision to take control of all available water. This creates a two-edged problem, one is the life-threatening thirst of the Palestinians (who are watching helplessly as Israel cordons off all available surface water and sucks the underground aquifers dry which feed Palestinian deep wells), the second, more critical problem that concerns the entire world, is Israeli belief in their inalienable right to demand from people whatever they want, because of some alleged “Divine Birthright.” In this case, demanding all available water underneath Israel/Palestine, will become a demand for Lebanon’s water flowing through the Litani River whenever the water crisis in Israel hits predetermined “red lines.” Israel’s Lake Kinneret reservoir is within days of hitting the red line, where the pumps will not reach the water and further pumping would cause massive ecological damage. The coastal and mountain aquifers are getting so low that seawater is beginning to infiltrate them. Desalination plants, one of Israel’s proudest technological achievements, cannot be used for irrigation, because the filtering process also eliminates vital minerals, which stunts plant growth. Anyone who studies Israeli history will know that the Zionist state will not go thirsty when so many “sub-human” Arabs in nearby Lebanon have plenty of the life-giving element. This water shortage represents a greater “existential threat” to Israel than Iran ever could. This may be Israel’s motivation for forcing the United States into picking a fight with Iran.
YAHOO Thursday, 10 July 2008
Taps have run dry in West Bank towns and Palestinians face acute water shortages as dry weather strains supplies already restricted by Israel, residents and the water authority said.

Parts of major West Bank cities such as Jenin, Hebron and Bethlehem have had no running water for about a month and even faucets in parts of Ramallah, the occupied West Bank's political hub which rarely experiences cuts, have been dry for days at a time in recent weeks, residents said.

"We have had no pumped water for 40 days," said Mahmoud Ibrahim from Jenin in the northern West Bank. "We have to buy water from vendors in the street."

Water is an increasingly scarce resource in the Middle East and is one of the core issues for any Palestinian-Israeli peace accord. Arguments around the issue are complex.

"Israel controls our water supply -- this year is even worse as there is a shortage in rainfall," Shaddad Attili, director of the Palestinian Water Authority, told Reuters, predicting severe shortages across the West Bank and Gaza Strip this summer.

While parts of the West Bank often experience summer shortages, residents said the dry spells had been longer this year due to sharply reduced rainfall.

Israel controls much of the occupied West Bank's supplies, pumping water from an aquifer that bridges Israel and the West Bank and then selling some back to the Palestinians, quotas agreed under the 1993 Oslo Accords which rights groups say have not been increased in line with Palestinian population growth.

Israel also restricts the drilling of new Palestinian wells, arguing it needs to protect shared resources from over-pumping.

Dry weather means the Palestinian wells, which are not as deep as the Israeli-controlled ones, are drying up quickly.

Israel's Water Authority said on its website average daily per capita water consumption, including household and industrial use, was about 770 liters (203 gallons) in 2005 -- over 10 times the 60 liters (16 gallons) Attili said Palestinians consumed last year.

Israeli human rights group B'Tselem said a drought -- which has this year deprived parts of the West Bank of almost half its normal rainfall -- and "unfair" distribution of water resources would cause severe shortages in Palestinian areas this year.

The International Committee of the Red Cross last month started trucking in water for about 1,000 people and 50,000 animals in the worst affected areas of the southern West Bank.

"We have water under our feet," Attili said. "But people are thirsty and we aren't allowed to use it while settlers and Israelis in general are enjoying swimming pools and irrigation."

justgetthere.us Mon, 14 Apr 2008
First, I would like to acquaint those of you whom are unaware with Dean Kamen’s newest invention: the Slingshot; and how it’s potential for global good is beyond anything I’ve seen in my lifetime. Secondly, I am taking this opportunity to voice my frustration with how difficult it has been to come by this information: what Kamen and his team have managed to accomplish in the conception and realization of this glorious contraption.

“Eighty percent of all the diseases you could name would be wiped out if you just gave people clean water,” says Kamen. “The water purifier makes 1,000 liters of clean water a day, and we don’t care what goes into it. And the power generator makes a kilowatt of anything that burns.”

The Slingshot is one of those once-in-a-lifetime inventions that truly can save the world. It takes any contaminated source of water, even pure raw sewage, and blasts the water out of the source by vaporizing it, extracting it, and storing it. The contents that have been extracted from the water is deposited in a separate bin and can even be used as a combustible to power the engine!

My favorite quote of Kamen’s is the following, “Not required are engineers, pipelines, epidemiologists, or microbiologists. You don’t need any -ologists. You don’t need any building permits, bribery, or buræucracies.” Sounds like my kinda guy...

Kamen says that the prototype device is hand-machined at a cost of $100,000 - however, his goal is through mass production to lower the cost to $1,000 per unit.

Once a fluid has passed through this device it’s actually pure, distilled water. Any bottled water that you can buy off-the-shelf has far more minerals and other contaminates than you’ll find in this clean liquid-gold. It really doesn’t matter what the input source was, the export is pure, clean water. Generally, water is taken from its source, then chlorine along with other chemicals are added to disinfect it to make it biologically inactive. When these units are a thousand dollars a pop, sign me up. I’d prefer the water processed by this machine to anything I’m drawing from my faucet, and nuts to paying three dollars a liter for off-the-shelf bottled water that’s nowhere near as clean!

TOP Water Videos
WPN  
Cow Sh*t to Clean Water
YOUTUBE 24 November 2008
Over 1.1 billion people in the world don't have access to clean drinking water. When I heard of a nanotech water purifier that can be used to purify water from even fecal matter contaminated...

 Monday, 12 Sep 2011 10:24:31 UTC/GMT

NEWS SUMMARY PAGE | Add SN feed to your site | Terms of Use 

Search SpideredNews.com  

Important: SpideredNews does not send out mass (general) emails or newsletters. Any such emails you receive are forged/spoofed, and should be treated as bogus.
This site is independent, and does not imply any endorsement by any third party or site. For all feedback, including to report any abuse, e-mail editorial@spiderednews.com